Is it Antique Furniture OR is it a Reproduction?

Hello Readers,

For years, I’ve had an idea to show you pictures of rooms and then ask if they were decorated within the last ten years or at least 50 years ago.

The problem is that unless I do a lot of manipulating to make the new images look like old ones, you’ll be able to tell right away based on the image itself, not what it’s showing you.

However, I have another idea: to show you some genuine antique furniture pieces and some genuine fakes. haha

Now, the prevailing thinking going back as far as I can remember is that anything 100 years or older is an antique. However, don’t we need to say 150 years now? Anything after that should be considered vintage. I guess it depends on how one looks at it.

Although some antiquarians are now calling EVERYTHING vintage, some folks call something from the 1930s antique.

So, for this exercise, I will show you antique furniture from the 18th and 19th centuries.

These are the classic furniture pieces talked about frequently.

And, I will show you its counterpart that was made within the last 30 years or so.

What about the furniture that was made between 1900 and around 1990? We’ll call that vintage, and I will throw in some of those pieces too. Many pieces of furniture in the period and the late 19th century often looks the same as furniture of the period. However, unless it was created in the actual period, it is in the manner or style of the period.

But, there’s a fourth category.

The piece was created in the 18th or 19th century. However, it’s been refurbished. It might’ve been completely stripped of its original paint or stain, and then an artisan replicated the old finish with new paint.

Before you get all hot on under the collar at the thought of someone desecrating the provenance of this fine antique, it’s good to consider the condition of the piece of furniture being refinished.

If antique furniture is in terrible condition, then, of course, it needs to be properly restored.

Often, that might mean the appropriate cleaning finished off with a wax or oil to bring out the beautiful patina, which can only come with time.

So, the point is that a total sanding down to the bare wood should only be undertaken if necessary. If it’s a very old and rare piece, but someone used it as a cutting board and cleaned it with straight vinegar, the finish will be nil, and refinishing it will most likely increase its value.

However, this post is not about the intricacies of antique preservation. That’s not my domain.

Gosh, I got slammed about slipper chairs and light bulbs. I shudder to think what y’all are going to say about antiques.

Still, there are some definite classifications.

There is fine stained wood furniture.

First Name

Email

Yes! Gimme the free report!

While the techniques might be different today than they were 250 years ago, these pieces generally need to stay as is if they are very old and valuable.

Then, there are old painted pieces.

These can also be quite fine, or they can be incredibly weathered. Often, the pieces were painted over and over for hundreds of years. Then, when the furniture ceases to be painted, the various layers begin to show. And that isn’t easy to replicate unless one wants to spend hundreds of hours painting and hitting the piece with a rake and chains.

I guess one could always send the piece to an elementary school and let the kids use it as a playground toy.

Another point regarding pieces meant to mimic old finishes is the skill of the artist doing the faux aging. One tell-tale sign that a piece does not have its original painted finish is that the “wear” areas look too predictable. OR, the wear areas look ridiculously staged.

The edges don’t always wear out the most. They don’t consider the myriad of mishaps and regular wear and tear. Maybe Dad picked up his saddle, and the stirrups scraped the top as he rushed outside to herd the sheep.

However, genuinely old pieces sometimes look more like the piece was in a train wreck that caught on fire, and then someone through some paint over the burnt part and said, “That’s better.”

Still, that’s a tough sell for a “new” piece of furniture.

I feel the same way about antiquing new furniture pieces that I do about plastic surgery.

A little goes a long way. Based on many of the disasters I’ve seen in Hollywood, it seems prudent to do half as much as the doctor says is not enough. (Clearly, they don’t know how much is enough.) Less really IS more.

Okay, so I’ve been trying to think about the best way to present this to you.

If you want to play along and test yourself to see if you can tell an antique furniture piece from a reproduction, please go and get a piece of paper. Or, use a notepad on your device.

I am going to share several boards.

Most of the boards have six pieces of furniture. Each piece of antique furniture has a number. There are 45 pieces, including case pieces, dining tables, and dining chairs.

All of them are in the manner of the late 18th-early 19th century. The pieces I’m calling contemporary are still in the manner of the late 18th-early 19th century but were manufactured in the last 40 years or so.

There is nothing outlandishly weird here.

However, I did not take the photos, and time prevented me from using a close-up image of all but the first three. Therefore, some of the pictures might be small or unclear enough to see some of the detail.

Laurel, where can we see the answers?

I’m not telling you yet, because you guys, as darling as you all are, won’t be able to help yourself from looking, thinking no one will know but you. That’s true.

Okay, let’s begin with the first three beautiful antique cabinets. But, wait. Are they actual antique furniture pieces, or are some not even close to being antique?

What? You thought this would be easy?

Hehe.

It’s okay; some of them are a little easier. They’re easier because it’s challenging to replicate the antiques. OR, the original pieces are pretty rare. You’ll see what I mean later on.

Please also note that some are still antiques. They’re not “of the period.”

Next up for our antique furniture challenge are six breakfronts.

I’m breaking up the stained wood (not the breakfronts) ;] with some painted antique pieces below. These are all in the Gustavian Swedish style. But, some could also be French. Just know the numbers will be out of order.

We’ll go back to our English antique furniture pieces for buffets or sideboards.

Don’t worry if you can’t tell the difference. You’re not supposed to. That’s the sign of a super-well-done reproduction.

Let’s look at some beautiful dining tables in both the English Georgian and Gustavian styles on one board.

I know. This one is super tough. And remember, if you don’t get them right, it doesn’t mean you’re not knowledgeable.

I didn’t do any Chippendale or Georgian chairs because most of those are impossible to tell apart unless up close.

However, below you will find French (Louis XVI) and Gustavian chairs.

These two styles were both popular furniture styles of the late 18th century.

Above is the French Louis XVI style I meant to say on the board. This one is a challenge, for sure.

The Gustavian chairs are a little easier to tell. At least it’s easier to tell the 18th-century versions because of the irregularities in some of them.

And, the last grouping has some smaller Gustavian-Style antique furniture pieces.

I will help you out a little on this one. If I recall correctly, there are only two pieces, that are genuinely 18th-century.

If you’d like to know the answers, I put a widget with all of the pieces on another page that you can find by clicking this link. There should be information about when the piece was created in each description, but if you want to know more about any of the pieces, you can click on the image for more information.

I hope you enjoyed this exercise.

After you’ve scored yourself, please come back and tell us how you did. Also, please tell us if you were super surprised to learn that a piece was either a bonafide 18th-century antique. Or, it was actually a contemporary piece that you would’ve sworn was 250 years old.

Speaking of which, it was just Wolfgang Mozart’s birthday on January 27th, his 267th. It’s easy for me to remember because he was born exactly 200 years and 11 days before me.

To honor my favorite composer, please visit this post for a link to the glorious Piano Concert #23, performed exquisitely by Menahem Pressler.

xo,

PS: Please check out the newly updated HOT SALES. Two huge sales are ending tomorrow, January 30th.